PandaBoard/4430vs4460PandaBoard
From OMAPpedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* PandaBoard ES has the DSI signals brought out on the back of the board (DSI signals were not exposed on the 4430 PandaBoard) | * PandaBoard ES has the DSI signals brought out on the back of the board (DSI signals were not exposed on the 4430 PandaBoard) | ||
* PandaBoard ES has a sysboot switch populated to control the boot order (No such switch existed on the 4430 PandaBoard) | * PandaBoard ES has a sysboot switch populated to control the boot order (No such switch existed on the 4430 PandaBoard) | ||
| - | * Audio-in connected to Auxiliary inputs (AFML/R) on Phoenix on | + | * Audio-in connected to Auxiliary inputs (AFML/R) on Phoenix on PandaBoard ES (not HSMIC as in 4430 Panda - so we can support stereo input use cases) |
Latest revision as of 17:27, 1 December 2011
Main Differences between the PandaBoard vs PandaBoard ES:
- OMAP4460 silicon on PandaBoard ES vs OMAP4430 silicon on PandaBoard (Up to 1.2 Ghz vs 1.0 Ghz)
- PandaBoard ES uses the TiWi-BLE module with support for Bluetooth Low Energy (TiWi-R2 module is used on the 4430 PandaBoard)
- PandaBoard ES uses the TPS62361 part to power the VDD_MPU instead of TWL6030
- PandaBoard ES has the DSI signals brought out on the back of the board (DSI signals were not exposed on the 4430 PandaBoard)
- PandaBoard ES has a sysboot switch populated to control the boot order (No such switch existed on the 4430 PandaBoard)
- Audio-in connected to Auxiliary inputs (AFML/R) on Phoenix on PandaBoard ES (not HSMIC as in 4430 Panda - so we can support stereo input use cases)
